can anyone tell me where i can find a good summary that discusses the pros and cons and differences between rotational hitting and tom emanski's "major league swing" (combinational approach of rotational into linear, or some might say linear into rotational)?
also, i know little about rotational mechanics, tho i have watched englishbey's introductory dvd. am i correct in saying that mike epstein and steve englishbey are the leaders of the rotational method? and players who use this are barry bonds, alfonso soriano, pete rose, and johnny bench? did i get the names wrong?
also, for the antiquated strictly linear method, is the leader charlie lau? and the players who use this include george brett?
i am trying to decide which approach is right for me. thanks!
my coach says roatational hitters have more power but since they rotate quickly thru the hitting zone, they have less chance at making contact. whereas combinational hitters have more chance of making contact since they go linear thru the swing plane and extend as far as possible. but they lose a little power that way. is this right? i want to study the two methods. i found englishbey's dvd not that clear about exactly what he wanted us to do and how this differs from more traditional methods.
also, i know little about rotational mechanics, tho i have watched englishbey's introductory dvd. am i correct in saying that mike epstein and steve englishbey are the leaders of the rotational method? and players who use this are barry bonds, alfonso soriano, pete rose, and johnny bench? did i get the names wrong?
also, for the antiquated strictly linear method, is the leader charlie lau? and the players who use this include george brett?
i am trying to decide which approach is right for me. thanks!
my coach says roatational hitters have more power but since they rotate quickly thru the hitting zone, they have less chance at making contact. whereas combinational hitters have more chance of making contact since they go linear thru the swing plane and extend as far as possible. but they lose a little power that way. is this right? i want to study the two methods. i found englishbey's dvd not that clear about exactly what he wanted us to do and how this differs from more traditional methods.