What swing is everyone looking at the first or second? The first swing sucks, the second one is much better than the first.
you aren't looking thenI don’t see casting.
Personally because I've seen excellent weight transfer with a wide stance. If the batter is comfortable with a wide stance, they can still transfer weight. IMO that's the same argument as no stride vs stride.So....I've seen the description of "armsy," "not using her whole body," etc. etc. Why has no one mentioned her stance being way too wide, just picking the foot up, setting it right back down and getting very little weight transfer? The lack of coil is a byproduct of this wide stance also.
I'm more and more being sold on this philosophy of committing to the fall forward on time. Timing, Timing, Timing.
Look at all these old timers. They had it figured out with their simple swings.
Tall and fall