MagicMove
We use the Candrea school of thought for hitting, not exclusively, but we use a lot of his principles in hitting, and we've been an extremely successful hitting team. It looks like a difference in what we teach and what you're saying is in the initial stance. We teach our girls, basically, to stand upright with a slight bend at the waist and with the knees unlocked (rather than bent), ala Candrea. Is this something we should consider modifying? Just because I like explanations for our batters, does the "sit" have to do with zone coverage from top to bottom? I understand clearing the back hip, and we don't have trouble with that in our hitters, but we do struggle occassionally with low pitching. We play a great team every year in high school that lives with low pitches exclusively. They'd rather have us beat balls into the dirt and make us beat their defense. Would modifying in this way give us a little more success against them? Thanks.
Mike
We use the Candrea school of thought for hitting, not exclusively, but we use a lot of his principles in hitting, and we've been an extremely successful hitting team. It looks like a difference in what we teach and what you're saying is in the initial stance. We teach our girls, basically, to stand upright with a slight bend at the waist and with the knees unlocked (rather than bent), ala Candrea. Is this something we should consider modifying? Just because I like explanations for our batters, does the "sit" have to do with zone coverage from top to bottom? I understand clearing the back hip, and we don't have trouble with that in our hitters, but we do struggle occassionally with low pitching. We play a great team every year in high school that lives with low pitches exclusively. They'd rather have us beat balls into the dirt and make us beat their defense. Would modifying in this way give us a little more success against them? Thanks.
Mike