A guy from Cal State Berkley (I think) called me last year and was doing a study on it. Since my rise drops from lack of speed, I gave him Mike White's number. I'll call Mike and see if anything came of it.
Does the riseball really rise???
- Thread starter FastpitchFan
- Start date
Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch
Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.
- May 7, 2008
- 234
- 0
Brad . . . retired from bucket sitting
That's great, ROFL! My husband sits on that bucket so long with our two pitchers, one day I think he is going to stand up, and it is going to be following him
Ang
That's great, ROFL! My husband sits on that bucket so long with our two pitchers, one day I think he is going to stand up, and it is going to be following him
Ang
Ang
Make sure he doesnt have the indentation from the bucket on his butt when he drops his pants at the end of the day.
Make sure he doesnt have the indentation from the bucket on his butt when he drops his pants at the end of the day.
The riseball doesn't "rise". It drops less than normal.
A pitcher throws a fastball at 60 mph, or 880 feet/sec. Therefore, it takes the ball 0.045 seconds to go from the pitcher to the plate. (40/880). If the pitcher delivered the ball "straight" with neutral spin, the ball would drop 3.25 feet over that distance. A good riseball "drops" only about 2.25 feet over the same distance.
A hitter is trained through countless repetitions of both pitching and playing catch to factor the normal drop of a ball when making his/her swing. Thus, to the batter, the path of the riseball follows is a large deviation from the normal path of the ball. It really does appear to jump at the end of the pitch.
If you get a chance on the ESPN Classic channel, watch Bob Gibson strikeout 17 batters in the World Series. He had his backspin fastball working that day, and everyone was swinging under his pitches.
I caught a pitcher who had a great rise ball. I never could catch it.
JRW
A pitcher throws a fastball at 60 mph, or 880 feet/sec. Therefore, it takes the ball 0.045 seconds to go from the pitcher to the plate. (40/880). If the pitcher delivered the ball "straight" with neutral spin, the ball would drop 3.25 feet over that distance. A good riseball "drops" only about 2.25 feet over the same distance.
A hitter is trained through countless repetitions of both pitching and playing catch to factor the normal drop of a ball when making his/her swing. Thus, to the batter, the path of the riseball follows is a large deviation from the normal path of the ball. It really does appear to jump at the end of the pitch.
If you get a chance on the ESPN Classic channel, watch Bob Gibson strikeout 17 batters in the World Series. He had his backspin fastball working that day, and everyone was swinging under his pitches.
I caught a pitcher who had a great rise ball. I never could catch it.
JRW
I refuse to participate!!!!!
I know the physics and I know what I see and they don't match.
Life is like a box of chocolates Forrest.
Elliott
I know the physics and I know what I see and they don't match.
Life is like a box of chocolates Forrest.
Elliott
Simo
Former High School Coach
Ok, for those of you in the old forum you may remember that data (ball size, weight, seam height, # rotations, speed, distance) was sent to Dr. Wm Covert of MIT who wrote back a lengthy dissertation, that in the end concluded that the riseball DOES actually rise. Anyone who would like to check out this fellow's credentials is welcome to do so. He knows more about aeronautics than any room of softball experts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_E._Covert
Regards,
Chris
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_E._Covert
Regards,
Chris
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll believe it when you send me the report. I personally talked to Prof. Robert Adair, a former chairmen of the physics department at Yale, member of the National Academy of Science, and author of the book, "The Physics of Baseball" about this issue. He said "No, it doesn't rise."
In any event, here is a good web page on it:
http://www.physics.armstrong.edu/faculty/mullenax/research/riseball.html
They were able to get a "JUGS" softball to rise, but not a regulation softball. A JUGS softball weighs 1/3 of a regular softball. The author speculates that it might be possible to get a regulation softball to rise. Again, I think the physics will show that a person can't get a ball to spin fast enough to get the ball to rise.
JRW
In any event, here is a good web page on it:
http://www.physics.armstrong.edu/faculty/mullenax/research/riseball.html
They were able to get a "JUGS" softball to rise, but not a regulation softball. A JUGS softball weighs 1/3 of a regular softball. The author speculates that it might be possible to get a regulation softball to rise. Again, I think the physics will show that a person can't get a ball to spin fast enough to get the ball to rise.
JRW
Simo
Former High School Coach
Riseball Rises?
Dr. Covert is one of the most respected aeronautical engineers on the planet and was chosen to head the team that investigated the Challenger Disaster. I don't know what else to say? A softball also has aggressive seams. It is not a smooth sphere. Sorry, but the email was cut and pasted on the old FP Forum years ago. I will say the same thing that I said then. For those who believe and have caught a good riseball pitcher, no explanation is necessary. For the naysayers, none is possible. We couldn't turn them around at that time when the actual document was presented to the forum. I doubt replicating it would change any minds today.
Thanks Marc for starting this all over again!
Regards,
Chris
Dr. Covert is one of the most respected aeronautical engineers on the planet and was chosen to head the team that investigated the Challenger Disaster. I don't know what else to say? A softball also has aggressive seams. It is not a smooth sphere. Sorry, but the email was cut and pasted on the old FP Forum years ago. I will say the same thing that I said then. For those who believe and have caught a good riseball pitcher, no explanation is necessary. For the naysayers, none is possible. We couldn't turn them around at that time when the actual document was presented to the forum. I doubt replicating it would change any minds today.
Thanks Marc for starting this all over again!
Regards,
Chris
