- May 29, 2015
- 3,808
- 113
Just received the 2020 NFHS books this week and I had already posted this on an umpire forum ... thought it would be good conversation here as well. It is an extremely rare circumstance which you may never see, but those make for fun conversation!
There was an editorial change to 8-4-3(d). This deals with what happens when a fielder uses a piece of detached equipment to pickup or stop a ball.
The change to the rule was an editorial change to clean up language so that the penalty awards are applied to runners and the batter runner, and it no longer includes the batter. (It never should have included the batter.)
In the article it includes a case play with two parts (a and b). The part a I am fine with, but I think the information on part b is incorrect.
With a runner on first base and no outs, a batter swings at a 3-2 pitch in the dirt. The ball gets past the catcher who then picks the ball up with her helmet/mask. According to the article, R1 is awarded second base (yes) and the batter (designated as B2) is awarded first base.
I disagree with that ... the batter was retired (she is no longer the batter) and does not have the opportunity to become a batter runner on the uncaught third strike (due to the runner on first), thus she should NOT be awarded first base.
(Part a is the same play, but with a 2-0 count. The ruling on it is correct: award the base runner second, the batter stays at bat with a 2-1 count.)
Thoughts here?
There was an editorial change to 8-4-3(d). This deals with what happens when a fielder uses a piece of detached equipment to pickup or stop a ball.
The change to the rule was an editorial change to clean up language so that the penalty awards are applied to runners and the batter runner, and it no longer includes the batter. (It never should have included the batter.)
In the article it includes a case play with two parts (a and b). The part a I am fine with, but I think the information on part b is incorrect.
With a runner on first base and no outs, a batter swings at a 3-2 pitch in the dirt. The ball gets past the catcher who then picks the ball up with her helmet/mask. According to the article, R1 is awarded second base (yes) and the batter (designated as B2) is awarded first base.
I disagree with that ... the batter was retired (she is no longer the batter) and does not have the opportunity to become a batter runner on the uncaught third strike (due to the runner on first), thus she should NOT be awarded first base.
(Part a is the same play, but with a 2-0 count. The ruling on it is correct: award the base runner second, the batter stays at bat with a 2-1 count.)
Thoughts here?