Bunted ball hits bat in fair territory.

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

Jun 3, 2010
171
0
I have heard two different explanantions about a ball that rolls into a bat in fair territory. Intentional or un intentional. What are the correct rules?

I saw a ball bunted yesterday that had back spin on it, when it hit the ground the ball spun backwards 3 feet and hit the batters bat that was laying in fair territory. The HPU called the batter out and made a runner go back to 2b.
 
Jun 22, 2008
3,757
113
The batter is still responsible for the bat as long as it is moving. Once the bat is stationary, it becomes part of the field. The question that has to be answered is, did the ball hit the bat, or did the bat hit the ball? If in the umpires judgement the bat hit the ball, the batter would be called out. If in their judgement the ball hit the bat, it is nothing, live ball.
 
Sep 14, 2011
768
18
Glendale, AZ
The batter is still responsible for the bat as long as it is moving. Once the bat is stationary, it becomes part of the field. The question that has to be answered is, did the ball hit the bat, or did the bat hit the ball? If in the umpires judgement the bat hit the ball, the batter would be called out. If in their judgement the ball hit the bat, it is nothing, live ball.

To add to this, if both the bat and the ball are moving when they contact each other, then the bat has hit the ball, interference, batter/runner is out.
 

MTR

Jun 22, 2008
3,438
48
why, irish? OP never mentioned any fielder making a play on the ball.

Because it is a fair batted ball which means there is no longer a batter (rule 7), but a batter-runner (rule 8). It is a fair batted ball which means there is no longer a batter, but a BR.

7.6.K dictates the batter hits the ball a second time. The notation involving the dropped bat is an exception noting the ball ball remains live, not when it becomes dead due to interference.

8.2.F.5 is more inclusive. Would not a discarded bat hitting a fair batted ball be interfering with the defense's attempt to make a play on that ball? Also, if you check 8.6.C, it states that when a batter, batter-runner or runner is called out for interference, all other runners return to the last base touched at the time of the interference.

I will grant you the point that 7.6.K is the most often cited in such a case, but what are you going to tell the coach who wants to raise the issue that if there is a fair batted ball, by rule, there is no longer a batter? :)
 
Mar 14, 2010
7
0
whichever, TOP or TOI, placement of runners would most likely come out to be the same.

but whatever you smoking, I'm not buying.

Because it is a fair batted ball which means there is no longer a batter (rule 7), but a batter-runner (rule 8). It is a fair batted ball which means there is no longer a batter, but a BR.

7.6.K dictates the batter hits the ball a second time. The notation involving the dropped bat is an exception noting the ball ball remains live, not when it becomes dead due to interference.

8.2.F.5 is more inclusive. Would not a discarded bat hitting a fair batted ball be interfering with the defense's attempt to make a play on that ball? Also, if you check 8.6.C, it states that when a batter, batter-runner or runner is called out for interference, all other runners return to the last base touched at the time of the interference.

I will grant you the point that 7.6.K is the most often cited in such a case, but what are you going to tell the coach who wants to raise the issue that if there is a fair batted ball, by rule, there is no longer a batter? :)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,878
Messages
680,284
Members
21,500
Latest member
3girlsDad
Top