Runner interferance

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

Mar 28, 2016
164
18
We had this situation come up the other day.

Runner on 3rd and 2 out.
The batter hits a spinning pop fly down the 3rd base line between home and 3rd.
The 3rd baseman goes to make a play for the ball and runs into the runner on 3rd who was in fair territory and off the bag.
The umpire calls the runner out immediately for the 3rd out of the inning.
The ball lands in fair territory and spins foul (probably would have been caught without the interference).

The next inning the same batter comes up. Was this correct?

Our team waited to see what would happen, and she struck out anyways. We weren't sure if her at bat should have ended in the previous inning.
 

MTR

Jun 22, 2008
3,438
48
We had this situation come up the other day.

Runner on 3rd and 2 out.
The batter hits a spinning pop fly down the 3rd base line between home and 3rd.
The 3rd baseman goes to make a play for the ball and runs into the runner on 3rd who was in fair territory and off the bag.
The umpire calls the runner out immediately for the 3rd out of the inning.
The ball lands in fair territory and spins foul (probably would have been caught without the interference).

The next inning the same batter comes up. Was this correct?

Our team waited to see what would happen, and she struck out anyways. We weren't sure if her at bat should have ended in the previous inning.

No, the batter completed her turn at bat. The next batter should have led off the next inning for her team.
 

MTR

Jun 22, 2008
3,438
48
Even though it ended up being a foul ball?

what if the ball was hit in foul territory with the same scenario?

It wasn't a foul ball. The ball's status is determined by it's location at the time of the INT. From the OP, that seems it was over fair territory which determines the balls status as fair.
 

Strike2

Allergic to BS
Nov 14, 2014
2,054
113
It wasn't a foul ball. The ball's status is determined by it's location at the time of the INT. From the OP, that seems it was over fair territory which determines the balls status as fair.

So, if the situation was less than two outs, the batter would have been placed on 1B after the "dead ball" call?
 
Jun 22, 2008
3,757
113
So, if the situation was less than two outs, the batter would have been placed on 1B after the "dead ball" call?

Going to depend on the rule set and if the umpire judged it to be catchable with normal effort. In most rule sets, the ball is dead immediately on the interference and since the ball was over fair territory when the interference occurred, yes the batter would be awarded 1st base. In USA, if the ball is catchable with normal effort and the runner interferes with the fielder catching the ball, both the runner and the batter are out.
 

Strike2

Allergic to BS
Nov 14, 2014
2,054
113
In USA, if the ball is catchable with normal effort and the runner interferes with the fielder catching the ball, both the runner and the batter are out.

I would like to be sitting close by as a disinterested observer when THAT call gets made. Popcorn at the ready...
 
Jun 22, 2008
3,757
113
I would like to be sitting close by as a disinterested observer when THAT call gets made. Popcorn at the ready...
I have made the call, and had a uic that told the coach I screwed up. Then I had to edjumacate the uic on the rule too after the game.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
Jul 22, 2015
851
93
We had a very similar call in a HS game, however the ball was clearly in foul territory. The runner was called out and our team sent the next batter in the order up the next inning. After she completed her at bat we earned an extra out for batting out of order because the correct batter had not completed her at bat the previous inning.
 

MTR

Jun 22, 2008
3,438
48
We had a very similar call in a HS game, however the ball was clearly in foul territory. The runner was called out and our team sent the next batter in the order up the next inning. After she completed her at bat we earned an extra out for batting out of order because the correct batter had not completed her at bat the previous inning.

Different ruling if using NFHS as that set does not include the batter being ruled out
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,866
Messages
680,344
Members
21,525
Latest member
Go_Ask_Mom
Top