Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Yet another interference question

  1. #1
    I can talk softball all day Lightning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    206
    Thanked 142 Times in 84 Posts

    Default Yet another interference question

    So, bases are empty, two outs.

    Batter hits a pop up in foul territory on the first base side. (This ball is clearly foul, there's no way it's going to go fair.) P goes for the catch, it should be an easy catch but the batter-runner is jogging to first and is right in the middle of P's path to the ball. P stops short to avoid bowling her over, tries to run around her but she can't get to the ball in time.

    Ump says that he believes that P would have made the catch but it isn't interference because P didn't make contact with the runner. Coach says contact isn't necessary for interference.

    Who's right?

  2. #2
    I eat, sleep and breathe softball quincy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    7,270
    Thanks
    2,821
    Thanked 2,484 Times in 1,590 Posts

    Default

    You absolutely do not want players running into each other but it is a contact sport.

    No contact is necessary.

    Ump wants P to take out runner?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to quincy For This Useful Post:

    gamommax3 (04-16-2018)

  4. #3
    Certified softball maniac canyonjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,899
    Thanks
    205
    Thanked 1,021 Times in 593 Posts

    Default

    I can't believe how many times I have heard this said. It almost forces you to teach them to just run over the kid.

  5. #4
    I eat, sleep and breathe softball quincy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    7,270
    Thanks
    2,821
    Thanked 2,484 Times in 1,590 Posts

    Default

    I can understand parents and maybe coaches but ump should know better.

  6. #5
    I can talk softball all day Lightning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    213
    Thanks
    206
    Thanked 142 Times in 84 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quincy View Post
    Ump wants P to take out runner?
    Yeah, that's what I was wondering. P is about 8 inches taller and at least 30 pounds heavier than the runner - nothing good would have come from that.

  7. #6
    Always learning... Eric F's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    8,557
    Thanks
    5,423
    Thanked 6,573 Times in 3,379 Posts

    Default

    Contact is not necessary for either interference or obstruction.
    A TB parent's life...Drive. Write checks. Eat tacos.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eric F For This Useful Post:

    Lightning (04-16-2018), Sweet Lou (04-16-2018)

  9. #7
    MTR
    MTR is offline
    I eat, sleep and breathe softball MTR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,237
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 695 Times in 481 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lightning View Post
    So, bases are empty, two outs.

    Batter hits a pop up in foul territory on the first base side. (This ball is clearly foul, there's no way it's going to go fair.) P goes for the catch, it should be an easy catch but the batter-runner is jogging to first and is right in the middle of P's path to the ball. P stops short to avoid bowling her over, tries to run around her but she can't get to the ball in time.

    Ump says that he believes that P would have made the catch but it isn't interference because P didn't make contact with the runner. Coach says contact isn't necessary for interference.

    Who's right?
    Not the umpire. This must have happened in SoCal since that seems to be common thread from that area when coaches claim that is why their umpires will not call INT or OBS without contact.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to MTR For This Useful Post:

    Lightning (04-17-2018)

  11. #8
    I can talk softball all day chardrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts

    Default

    This is a frustration of mine. They keep reiterating to avoid contact to make the game safer, but the number of non-calls is almost forcing the contact.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
    *********
    Jon in Texas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Segment -- Burn -- Conversion --