Im just curious.
Many times, if an umpire applies his/her interpretation of a rule incorrectly, or even applies a rule not in the ruleset, a coaches only recourse is to "play the remainder of the game under protest".
so, what does this mean?
it implies to me, that perhaps the results of the game might be "throw out", if the UIC determines that the game umpire misappropriately applied a ruling that affected the outcome?
But is this true?
and is it a realistic expectation?
Many times, if an umpire applies his/her interpretation of a rule incorrectly, or even applies a rule not in the ruleset, a coaches only recourse is to "play the remainder of the game under protest".
so, what does this mean?
it implies to me, that perhaps the results of the game might be "throw out", if the UIC determines that the game umpire misappropriately applied a ruling that affected the outcome?
But is this true?
and is it a realistic expectation?
Last edited: