Drive Mechanics

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

javasource

6-4-3 = 2
May 6, 2013
1,347
48
Western NY
Posture & the Kinetic Chain: The Inner Core

The predominant theme when addressing Posture & the Kinetic Chain is STABILIZATION. The two major stabilizing systems in the human body are the Inner and Outer Core. Let us talk about the Inner Core…

Some of the primary Inner Core muscles are: Transverse Abdominus (TA), Lumbar Multifidus (LM), the Diaphragm, and the posterior fibers of the Internal Obliques. Here's an illustration of a few:



The Inner Core musculature is unique… in that it generates little to no movement during activation. These muscles originate (have insertion points) in the spine… and when they contract… they serve to stabilize the spine (called… segmental stabilization). The TA and LM muscles achieve stabilization (in the lower abdomen) through cocontraction; drawing the abdominal wall inwards. The Diaphragm serves as a spinal stabilizer via contraction; independent of respiration.

“Heathly” activation of these inner muscles precedes distal (arm and leg) movements (by as much as 30-110 milliseconds)… and the ability of these muscles to contract prior to their phasic counterparts… or the outer core muscles… is very important.

Inner Core muscles are referred to as local or ‘deep’ muscles. They are: deeply oriented, predominantly slow-twitch in nature, and get activated at low resistance levels. They respond in an anticipatory nature and are critical for endurance activities. The Inner Core muscles are ‘Core Stability’.

Core Stability is marked by the ability to control the trunk position over the pelvis… thus allowing energy production and transfer to take place through this region. There is a key region in our core that serves as one of the most important ‘links’ in the kinetic chain. This link joins the upper and lower extremities AND the left and right sides of the body. It’s called the thoracolumbar fascia. The thoracolumbar fascia is connected to the internal obliques and the TA… which provides cylindrical stabilization. This is our anatomical back-brace support belt… and should be viewed as a primary proximal link.

Remember the importance of dorsi-flexion in the ankle? Remember the importance of the glutes firing during the drive? Remember the importance of stabilizing the scapular region in the shoulder? The thoracolumbar fascia is the cross-over link between these segments. Put simply… if the LEFT ankle doesn’t dorsiflex… the LEFT glute doesn’t fire. If the Left glute doesn’t fire… the RIGHT scapular stabilizers don’t fire. The cross-over from LEFT glute to RIGHT scapula takes place in the thoracolumbar fascia. Pretty cool, huh? Here’s a combined illustration of the thoraculumbar fascia and its role in joining the upper/lower and left/right extremities:



A common argument - in sports that are not marked as endurance in nature… but comprised more of short power movements (like softball) - is the non-necessity to train the inner core. This notion is foolish and a dangerous one to embrace; if the inner core muscles have functional deficiencies, the outer core muscles will be recruited… making movements inefficient and significantly altering stability.

In MANY high-level pitchers (and other athletes), this balance gets overlooked throughout their career; creating a vicious cycle of degeneration and dysfunction between the spinal vertebrae through compensatory biomechanics. Even worse, the damage they are creating is non-symptomatic. Through years of unintentional abuse, these athletes lose the ability to stabilize the spine with the inner core (the primary stabilizers). As such, their performance starts to suffer… and shortly afterward… a permanent resident moves in; chronic lower back pain. The damage is done… and their career usually ends.

Low intensity movements - like holding a plank position - will target the inner core in an effort to stabilize the lumbar spine; whereas high intensity movements target the larger and outer musculature of the trunk and core. As such, many trainers foolishly abandon isometric training (static exercises) that develop the inner core… in an effort to maximize their athletes' performance in a more efficient manner (by focusing only on the outer ‘strength and power producing’ core).

Although strength and power is not the role of the inner core, spinal integrity and stiffness must be created internally… as the lumbar spine is pliant (comprised of five joined segments) and receives forces from all directions. In response to these forces, proprioceptive neurological signals are sent to the central nervous system; and it immediately responds… sending back signals that create muscle stiffness or relaxation around the lumbar spine; depending on the type of load. Regardless of the task you’re performing, low-levels of muscle activation are necessary to support the lumbar spine, but make no mistake… maintaining these low-level capabilities are paramount to healthy and efficient movement/performance.

Whereas the lumbar vertebrae provide for trunk flexion and extension, the cervical and thoracic segments allow for rotational movement. The stiffness of the lumbar vertebrae allows for tri-axial mobility in the trunk (a pretty dang important pitching requirement)… by managing the loads received and acting as the proximal base for the thoracic and cervical segments of the spine (a chained reaction). This is beyond important… as the ability to manage these forces while providing flexion and rotation in the trunk… is what creates high angular velocities in the distal segments. Here’s a handy little combined illustration of the different spine segments and their corresponding body segment roles:



Lastly, I previously noted that the inner core is comprised predominantly of the slow-twitch muscle fiber type. The majority of the human body is 50/50…. but with the inner core… the average is roughly 60% (Type I, slow-twitch) to 40% (Type II, fast-twitch). Type II anaerobic muscle fibers have nearly three times the contractile velocity of Type I oxidative muscle fibers… and some recent studies have yielded impressive increased throwing velocity returns… with the theory that high-intensity training may stimulate the growth of Type II fibers in the inner core. This research is exciting… but it’s critical that your workouts be balanced… combining isotonic AND isometric exercises. Here’s a handy chart explaining the differences in the skeletal muscle fiber types:



Naturally, in response to this notion, I’ve developed a routine (based on the work of other, much smarter people) that to date, has consistently yielded a 5 to 10 percent increase in pitching velocity. Better yet… it takes less than two months… and is required only 3 days a week. Take that, p90x!!! More on that later! Next up… The Outer Core...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Feb 3, 2010
5,768
113
Pac NW
Naturally, in response to this notion, I’ve developed a routine (based on the work of other, much smarter people) that to date, has consistently yielded a 5 to 10 percent increase in pitching velocity. Better yet… it takes less than two months… and is required only 3 days a week. Take that, p90x!!! More on that later!

Just like any good series: bait and wait!
 
i just want to say that this thread has been an extreme help for my DD. The first point in this thread, has made of all of the differnce in the world for her.

A) High Knee Drive – The best way to enable your hips to move through a full range of motion is to have substantial knee drive; getting your thighs perpendicular to the torso should be a focus.

She has always had a push off that was very linear and paralell to the ground, there was little knee drive, or elevation of the thigh.

The terminology that she responded to was "jump out AND up" this instatntly raised the stride leg, enabling her to fully open for the first time ever, and has greatly improved her accuracy and as a side benefit a minor increase in velocity. And the most important thing- a BIG boost to confidence.

I cannot thank all of the people on this site enough. Everyone on this site is my DD's coach.
 

javasource

6-4-3 = 2
May 6, 2013
1,347
48
Western NY
Posture & the Kinetic Chain: The Outer Core

Part I – From da Vinci to ‘da Java’


Leonardo da Vinci was one smart dude - that was way ahead of the curve. Although his work can get quite complicated, he provided a simplistic understanding of our muscle system that should be revisited from time to time. Nowadays, the classifications assigned to the groups and roles of muscles are confusing at best. Here are a few: inner/outer, phasic/postural, slow-twitch/fast-twitch, stabilizer/mobilizer, oxidative/anaerobic, overactive/inhibited, type I/type II, local/global, and on and on…

Da Vinci kept it simple (relatively speaking)… stressing the importance of the location of muscles as they relate to a joint or attachment point. He believed, that based on their location, the inner muscles have a biomechanical advantage towards stabilization; whereas the location of the outer muscles made movement biomechanically advantageous. Again, the inner (or local) muscles have the primary purpose of stabilization… whereas the outer (or global) muscles are the movement producers. All the other mumbo-jumbo classifications can be made to fit into this simplistic classification system of Inner (Local) and Outer (Global) muscle classification.



Don’t get me wrong, all that other stuff is absolutely important…as it helps us paint a picture of what our physical training ‘masterpieces’ should look like. This said, our approach at training requires efficiency in time management, too. For this reason, it’s advantageous to approach a core training regiment with simple goals in mind, like: train the Inner (local) muscles… train the Outer (global) muscles.

Training is a common theme in my posts… I know… but the advancements in science and technology are ‘raising the bar’ on the requirements of today's athlete. Being born a ‘natural athlete’ is NOT enough. Sure, it may have been a while ago… but it won’t be anymore. You can learn all you want about pitching… but if you don’t get off your duff and physically train CORRECTLY, you will NOT ascend to the top ranks. I guarantee it.

If the Inner Core can be viewed as “Core Stability” … the Outer Core can be viewed as the “proximal stability” that we NEED to efficiently produce movement. It doesn’t take a degree to figure out that the trunk is the largest part of our body… the true “proximal” component. Controlling the trunk during pitching (or any other movement) is a result of learned/conditioned responses… that ultimately create an anticipation, to which our body adapts to.

You can say muscle memory doesn’t exist, but you would be wrong… because even in the most rudimentary levels of science, adaptation to surroundings/stimulus is remarkably present. We constantly adapt strategies… motor, sensory, and biomechanical… based on our previous experiences… and develop ingrained strategies as a result. Some of the most concrete evidence behind ‘muscle memory’ takes place during ‘unexpected’ events... and the only way our body can deal with these surprises is by making an anticipatory postural adjustment… NOT based on what is happening… but instead based upon a neuromuscular strategy developed from our previous ‘happenings’.



As previously noted, pitching combines a linear and rotational series of movements. The ability to control angular motions and joint rotations in each body segment is what determines the success – or failure – of the linear movements we perform. The larger phasic muscles of the Outer (global) core regulate and control movement, so this is an important discussion piece.

Larger masses require greater torque production to create more rotational inertia. As it pertains to our body, our ability to control this rotational inertia properly - via conditioning and positive repetition – will greatly influence our pitching development. For this reason, I spend a good amount of time limiting rotation of the trunk until ‘control’ and strength of the trunk is learned/developed. Again… once there is a foundation of inner strength/control in process, we can add some of that ‘violence’ JJ talked about a couple of months back.

Why limit trunk rotation initially? Well… high-level pitching is also a high-intensity movement… not known for grace and beauty… but instead marked by powerful and rather violent-looking movements. The larger muscles of the trunk and pelvis – or Outer Core – are known for their power/force and speed production. In addition to all the positives that these larger muscles can create for us… we must also remember that the forces generated by these muscles… are not only forces we can propel outwards… they are also forces that our inner core must control and learn to withstand. Remember, the spine is naturally unstable, and very much depends on learned synchronization of the inner and outer core muscles.

This said… if we desire to produce more velocity in the ball… we must ‘program’ our body to perform with higher velocity movements. This ballistic style of training is absolutely critical in high-level pitching... and if your pitching volume only goes to 10... you'll never see the benefits resulting from pitching with the volume at 12, 13, etc... Although many may tell you otherwise, I train ballistic pitching-style movements in the sagittal and frontal planes, primarily… with little to no focus on creating movement in the transverse plane. Planes got you confused? See here … or take a peak at this handy stick-figure summary... a true 'da Java' style masterpiece:



Boy, talk about contrasting art… ;)

I’m going to break this post off here… as the ‘rotational’ subject is one that might be a long one...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

javasource

6-4-3 = 2
May 6, 2013
1,347
48
Western NY
Posture & the Kinetic Chain: The Outer Core

Part II: The Rotational Dilemma


The primary objective of fastpitch pitching is just that; pitch fast. We want high angular velocities of the hand/ball… and to achieve this, many believe that a forced rotation or ‘closing’ of the trunk is the best way to achieve this. I’m not picking on one style of instruction… as this concept is embraced by many more than just the “door slammers”.

The mass of the trunk requires higher torque production than its more distal ‘attachments’ (the arm segments). So… the thought is… that by rotating the trunk forcefully, you’ll add to the speed of the pitch. However, the time available in a pitch, makes for a very small window of trunk torque potential… as we have to transfer energy through each arm segment.

Here’s the abridged process:

First, we NEED to get ‘open’. I hope you all agree that we should open earlier than later… and need to hold this ‘open’ position over the top of the circle. The very moment that our stride foot heel hits the ground… the energy from the ground and drive is flying through our body, up our legs, trunk, and into our shoulder, down our arm. Take a look at this Sarah gif I previously created… although it’s in no way a perfect representation of kinetic transfer… I did attempt to sync the “flow of energy” with her movements.



This means that once our stride foot heel contacts the ground… the window of opportunity to add more torque energy from our torso into our arm has nearly expired. You can argue this point all you want… I don’t think you find a light at the end of that tunnel.

Why? The combination of proximal to distal movement patterns… takes time… because of the deceleration moments required of the larger proximal segments. The changes in segment mass (from proximal to distal) allows the joint moment forces to be conserved and magnified at the smaller distal segments… resulting in high degrees of angular acceleration in the hand/ball.

I’ve posted this gif previously, too… but it’s a pretty handy example of the deceleration you see in proper proximal-distal sequencing… and the higher levels of acceleration that results from a series of jointed segments versus a single segment (i.e. with rotation only at the shoulder).



So… the joints in our arm require that we transfer energy through them (via deceleration of the more proximal segment)… and once we are well into our whip, the energy heading to the ball is already beyond the torso. On the pitching clock, you have around 3 pitching hours (from 11 to 8) to ‘core torque’. Although 3 hours may seem like a long time, Rick Pauly has taken the time to provide the reality. Three ‘pitching hours’ takes his daughter, Sarah, less than 14 hundredths of a second (<.14) to complete… nearly twice as fast as the human eye can complete a blink.

Considering the mass of your torso… do you really think your going to pull of a positive rotational moment of that massive structure in 14 hundredths of a second? In reality, high-level pitchers appear to do just that (see gif below)… but is it a conscious movement of the torso in the transverse plane… or is it a result of ballistic movements in the frontal and sagittal planes?

I choose the latter… as I know that when I tell a girl to power-through her whip from an open position… it’s that sagittal plane drive force… and it’s that frontal plane adduction force… that results in the observed transverse plane rotational movement. Point being… you’re going to get better results learning to power your drive and power-though your whip… than trying to learn to power-through an open-to-closed position, especially with instruction.

As mentioned, while training a kid to power their drive and power-though the whip…the result will be some level of transverse plane movement. The speed of powerful drive mechanics opens the pelvis and shoulders quickly… and the powerful adduction movement creates a feeling of abdominal bracing (or a bearing down feeling). IMO, these help create that quick hip snap you see in high-level pitchers. Again, I’m not saying rotation doesn’t happen… I’m just saying I don’t isolate and train it as a pitching motion. Most of the closing that happens at or after the release of the ball is, IMO, a product of residual energy dissipation from earlier rotation… as well an influence from the movement of the arm adducting into and across the body (being that the arm is attached to the torso…).

If you’re still scratching your head over the matter… take a look at some high-level pitchers… and what the rest of their body is doing the moment that their rotational ‘hip snap’ actually occurs. I think you’ll find that:

  1. It’s often a weightless move… meaning the stride heel hasn’t planted.
  2. Just prior to the rotational moment of the pelvis… the glove arm is usually at maximum height/extension… and when the ‘hip snap’ occurs… it is almost always at the first moment of ball/glove arm adduction. Watch the orientation of the glove... and how it changes at the first moment of a powerful adduction movement (elbows into side). You'll see the resultant snap... synchronized.



So, you'll have more success trying to keep a student open by getting them open... using the power of the outer core to control excessive rotation. Focus on a powerful drive off the plate to create proper backside timing, and then focus on powerfully adducting the arms into a relatively 'open' torso. The result of these powerful movements will result in a properly timed 'torque' of the torso... that we commonly refer to as 'hip snap'.

Just some food for thought. Coming up, we'll take a closer look at Hello Elbow… as it relates to rotational movement that the outer core is responsible for creating...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jul 26, 2010
3,563
0
Great post. You're going to get a lot of flack for it, some people don't like being told the earth is round.

-W
 
Jun 18, 2012
3,183
48
Utah
Javasource said, "Most of the closing that happens at or after the release of the ball is, IMO, a product of residual energy dissipation from earlier rotation… as well an influence from the movement of the arm adducting into and across the body (being that the arm is attached to the torso…)."

KAPOW.jpg

I LOVE IT!!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,857
Messages
680,203
Members
21,507
Latest member
eb7598
Top