Feedback on 12yr old

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

Jun 6, 2016
2,724
113
Chicago
This is to give an idea of the slop and weight shifting after toe touch, losing the coil and not turning right away.

giphy.gif
giphy.gif


The first clip he is maintaining coil until the back leg/hip starts to turn and the body/hip is still coiled as the body begins to turn. In your DD case she is still shifting after toe touch. The ML hitter isn't shifting the body forward after toe touch, any shifting happens prior to toe touch. So she really isn't staying back, still coiled.

I'll be back

Is a lot of what you're describing here and showing in the images the all back/all forward problem (I think I see her doing that, though I've definitely seen worse)?

In other words, is "maintaining coil" another way to describe that "separation" you want to have between upper/lower half on the stride?
 
Jan 6, 2009
6,627
113
Chehalis, Wa
Is a lot of what you're describing here and showing in the images the all back/all forward problem (I think I see her doing that, though I've definitely seen worse)?

In other words, is "maintaining coil" another way to describe that "separation" you want to have between upper/lower half on the stride?

Yes you can say she is all back and forward as well. The weight shift isn't stopping. Either is simple coiling and positioning the hips. That results in some "weight shift". The girl has a non stopping weight shift forward.

Yes, she doesn't have true separation as the stride ends, because she is using weight shift. The back hip should be open as the front foot plants (back leg should be turning). You shouldn't still be weight shifting.
 
Feb 16, 2015
933
43
South East
There is nothing you can do with the upperbody that will cause the lowerbody to work correctly. You can view the swing as top down. In the top down model there is less of a chance for mistakes made in the sequence. Meaning the ground up model doesn't have enough emphasis on the upperbody. In the top down model for instance you have to turn the back leg/hips right now to the command of the upperbody. Although this doesn't guarantee that will happen correctly.

Shawn can you elaborate some? I think I know what you are saying but not totally sure. I for one believe that if someone loads correctly and swing "top down" things will be incorrect order.
 
Last edited:
Jan 6, 2009
6,627
113
Chehalis, Wa
Shawn can you elaborate some? I think I know what you are saying but not totally sure. I for one believe that if someone loads correctly and swing "top down" things will be incorrect order.

Way back when, I learned that working from the ground up can create many, many problems. So I experimented with top down and making the body a slave to the upperbody. Thinking about the end result, what you want in the upperbody had a great result.

Mankin was the first one I heard that stated if you focus on rearward portion of the swing the hips would turn to support the rearward force. He actually said first on the internet (after I learned this myself) that you can focus on the upperbody and the body would support the upperbody.

So the top down model isn't nothing new.
 
Last edited:
Jan 6, 2009
6,627
113
Chehalis, Wa
How much "weight shift" is happening. And how much is simple positioning to get into a good launch position? (back knee in front of back foot, back hip in front of back knee).

Is there a weight shift?

giphy.gif


The girl is weight shifting.
 
Feb 16, 2015
933
43
South East
Way back when, I learned that working from the ground up can create many, many problems. So I experimented with top down and making the body a slave to the upperbody. Thinking about the end result, what you want in the upperbody had a great result.

Mankin was the first one I heard that stated if you focus on rearward portion of the swing the hips would turn to support the rearward force. He actually said first on the internet (after I learned this myself) that you can focus on the upperbody and the body would support the upperbody.

So the top down model isn't nothing new.

So you are pro top down? I am sure top down swing has been around for a long long time.
 
Jan 6, 2009
6,627
113
Chehalis, Wa
DRDRODD,

I think both ways have merit. You want to use the body to achieve the goal of transferring energy into the upperbody. You are thinking about the end result (upperbody), but that requires using the lowerbody well.

Yes Mankin was the first many, many years ago.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
42,854
Messages
680,143
Members
21,510
Latest member
brookeshaelee
Top