13yo Maddie

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

May 24, 2013
12,461
113
So Cal
You can do whatever you want with your shoulder, core, hips etc. but if your hands stay that close to your shoulder your finite possible speed at the end of your bat is simply less than if you hand more separation all other things staying equal. Now given fast pitching, bat technology and your daughters strength and ability she can continue to bomb ball with regularity without changing anything but the margin for error is less.

I like everything she has going on and her swing looks really good I just think without increased separation she won't get all the power she could out of her swing...the pull back must continue until her foot is down, right now she pull back OK but then stops and holds as her foot comes down.

Sorry if I sound like a broken record I think I've made this comment before but as mentioned she is doing sooooo much right and the stop and hold is much better than leaking but continuing to pull back is much better than holding OR if she has a feel for holding pull back more and hold from a position of greater separation.

View attachment 12284View attachment 12285View attachment 12286

Maddie's does much better (results-wise) when she stays shorter in the early part of the process. Adding length behind her shoulder leads to a long loop around to the ball. I do agree that the timing of when her hands get to the top needs some adjustment.

Also, the pic comparison isn't quite right. The video of Maddie was not facing her chest straight-on as it was for the other two.
 
Last edited:
Sep 29, 2014
2,421
113
I'm not sure if that is correct. Power may be diminished but not speed.
robot_skating.gif

agreed poor choice of words but you can't hit the ball with those T Rex arms ;) (wish I was a gif maker there are some cool tex rex short arm ones out there I'm sure). Maybe power is actually correct but finding the balance is key....as Eric stated if by bringing her hands back more she does not maintain the same hand path but loops her hands out more then that is a trade off you probably don't want to make.
 
Jun 17, 2009
15,037
0
Portland, OR
I'm seeing the front shoulder working up (a reaction to the rear-side scrunch), and then pulling back. The pull-back seems to me like a lower-middle back action, rather than retraction of the scap against the spine. Am I on the right path with this?

Good description. There is also a leveling of the lead-arm that is taking place at this point in the swing ... and that contributes to the barrel arc.
 
Jun 17, 2009
15,037
0
Portland, OR
I believe so. The actual names of the actions are still a challenge for me, at least until DD gets more involved with her PT classes :) IMO, it is more about stability in that area. If you do not have stability in the front scap/shoulder area at the proper time, other issues can develop. The reason I first agreed with the blog article in that the movement was retraction is because of the movement that sets this up to begin with. If you look at the beginning of the Ted clip, it appears to me that there is some 'protraction' in the front scap/shoulder area. This represents itself on this gif as the somewhat hunched look at his front shoulder. Just prior to when the stability occurs (same time you see "the front shoulder working up"), it seems to me that much of that original protraction is gone. As if the shoulder complex returned to a more neutral position. In order for this to occur, I made the assumption that moving out of protraction means you are doing the opposite of protracting, i.e. retracting. So while not pulling back against the spine, necessarily, there is some motion away from the hunched look. As I think about this more, I think a 'returning to neutral' is more accurate way to describe it than retraction.

Anyway, while I really don't focus on the front shoulder during instruction, it is something that I can look at to notice flaws. As an example, page through some of the threads that contain young hitters with bat drag or that dreaded DBSF :) In many cases, the hitters front shoulder doesn't return to this neutral position prior to launch. Is that a coincidence? I'm not so sure...

I think you are seeing the lead-arm leveling process. I teach it ... this is the "short hands" in the "short hands, long barrel" cue.
 
Jan 6, 2009
6,627
113
Chehalis, Wa
You can do whatever you want with your shoulder, core, hips etc. but if your hands stay that close to your shoulder your finite possible speed at the end of your bat is simply less than if you hand more separation all other things staying equal. Now given fast pitching, bat technology and your daughters strength and ability she can continue to bomb ball with regularity without changing anything but the margin for error is less.

I like everything she has going on and her swing looks really good I just think without increased separation she won't get all the power she could out of her swing...the pull back must continue until her foot is down, right now she pull back OK but then stops and holds as her foot comes down.

Sorry if I sound like a broken record I think I've made this comment before but as mentioned she is doing sooooo much right and the stop and hold is much better than leaking but continuing to pull back is much better than holding OR if she has a feel for holding pull back more and hold from a position of greater separation.

View attachment 12284View attachment 12285View attachment 12286

Actually many hitters load and hold or have very little pull back. The hands can stay in one place as well (walking away from the hands). You can have a good sequence with moving the hands back or pulling back and then holding during the part of the stride (hand stay back).
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
42,853
Messages
680,139
Members
21,510
Latest member
brookeshaelee
Top