Please help with proper etiquette for “tryout week”

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

Jun 29, 2013
589
18
Timely question. Most teams that I know ask for a specific deadline (within 24 hours, by this Friday, before we hold our next tryout, etc.) One or two that I know of ask for an answer immediately and tell you the offer is off the table if you go to another tryout for another team.
 

ian

Jun 11, 2015
1,175
48
Timely question. Most teams that I know ask for a specific deadline (within 24 hours, by this Friday, before we hold our next tryout, etc.) One or two that I know of ask for an answer immediately and tell you the offer is off the table if you go to another tryout for another team.

Well if the offer is off the table you better say yes. You can always reassess and do what is best for your child. Should go to all the tryouts you can make to keep your DDs skills sharp.
 
Aug 1, 2018
6
0
yeah i agree. asking for answer immediately isnt reasonable i dont think. I think every coach should expect a family to get as much as exposure as possible so they can make the best decision possible. Its a huge commitment and expensive. I know the pressure the coach is under as well. Its very tough situation. Hence I was wondering would is the norm out there. I think a week is fine. Am i wrong?
 
Apr 7, 2013
54
8
I would say go to all the Tryouts you want, but if there are 5 rank them in order of most desirable spot. If you get an offer early on from #1 or #2 better jump on it
 
Jun 29, 2013
589
18
Well if the offer is off the table you better say yes. You can always reassess and do what is best for your child. Should go to all the tryouts you can make to keep your DDs skills sharp.

I don't disagree, Ian. One team DD tried out for recently gave everyone 24 hours to respond. Some are doing what you suggest. Another that DD tried out for last winter asked all parents (after tryouts were done) if there was anyone who couldn't commit right away (meaning you would get a call back within a few hours, and they wanted a yes when they made the call). Nobody said no, but I know a few were thinking they would do this.
 
Feb 26, 2018
328
28
I'm fine with the 24-48 hours. That's mainly for the coaches or org. I wouldn't want to be kept waiting for longer than that and I wouldn't make someone else do it either. The head of one of the org's we tried out for over the weekend warned the girls that if any coach is pressuring you to make a decision right away, to run. I actually appreciated that because it shows what they expect from their coaches and the standards they have.
 
Aug 19, 2015
1,118
113
Atlanta, GA
I'm fine with the 24-48 hours. That's mainly for the coaches or org. I wouldn't want to be kept waiting for longer than that and I wouldn't make someone else do it either. The head of one of the org's we tried out for over the weekend warned the girls that if any coach is pressuring you to make a decision right away, to run. I actually appreciated that because it shows what they expect from their coaches and the standards they have.

But that's easier said than done when tryouts (especially the big organizational ones) are spread out over a three-week period. And I agree that the pressure for an immediate response reeks of desperation. My DD is a catcher and we want to know how the pitching situation is shaping up. If the coach currently only has one good pitcher and is still looking for two other "A level" pitchers, we don't really want to commit before we know that's actually going to happen, especially at the older levels (we're first year 16U).
 
Jul 16, 2008
1,520
48
Oregon
Had 2 players this weekend that we offered. We always tell whoever we offer to go home and talk about it then let us know. These 2 said Nope don't have to, this is the team I want to play for. They went on saying they have seen us in Tournaments (although I don't remember ever playing the team they played for) and like the way we coach and the way the team acts during games. It kind of blew me away because I don't remember seeing them watch our games, but they must have.

So not only players acting accordingly during games because you never know who is watching, it also goes for us coaches too.
 
Jul 16, 2013
4,659
113
Pennsylvania
But that's easier said than done when tryouts (especially the big organizational ones) are spread out over a three-week period. And I agree that the pressure for an immediate response reeks of desperation. My DD is a catcher and we want to know how the pitching situation is shaping up. If the coach currently only has one good pitcher and is still looking for two other "A level" pitchers, we don't really want to commit before we know that's actually going to happen, especially at the older levels (we're first year 16U).

I completely understand the thought process here, but I also think this is what causes some of the aggravation for all parties involved. If a team is in need of pitchers, they will typically want to get them committed first. But if the pitchers are also attending multiple tryouts and don't want to commit, it will drag out the entire process for everyone else. So not much will really happen until those top pitchers make up their minds. And if they would happen to change their minds after a commitment was made, you can really expect the musical chairs to begin. Reminds me of the LeBron James free agency situation.

Luckily it isn't a problem I really ever had to deal with. As a 'B" team, we always offered to retain all current players. And with few exceptions, the majority of our players/families have been honest with us regarding their intentions (except for our very first year...). So in most cases we would enter tryouts only needing 2 or 3 players to fill our roster, and never needed more than 1 pitcher. The last year we held official tryouts, we did have four pitchers try out for one available spot. One of them was clearly better than the other 3, but we also knew she was attending other tryouts. I spoke to her dad to gauge their interest. I felt that the interest was limited, so I offered her a spot and asked for an answer in 24 hours. At that point I moved on to the next player, who accepted immediately. Since we only ever needed a few players, we never really worried much about other team's tryouts. We filled our spots and moved on. The last three years, we didn't conduct tryouts at all. All available spots were filled by players that had reached out to me. I knew each of them personally and had no need to conduct a tryout with any of them.
 
Aug 19, 2015
1,118
113
Atlanta, GA
I completely understand the thought process here, but I also think this is what causes some of the aggravation for all parties involved. If a team is in need of pitchers, they will typically want to get them committed first. But if the pitchers are also attending multiple tryouts and don't want to commit, it will drag out the entire process for everyone else. So not much will really happen until those top pitchers make up their minds. And if they would happen to change their minds after a commitment was made, you can really expect the musical chairs to begin. Reminds me of the LeBron James free agency situation.

Luckily it isn't a problem I really ever had to deal with. As a 'B" team, we always offered to retain all current players. And with few exceptions, the majority of our players/families have been honest with us regarding their intentions (except for our very first year...). So in most cases we would enter tryouts only needing 2 or 3 players to fill our roster, and never needed more than 1 pitcher. The last year we held official tryouts, we did have four pitchers try out for one available spot. One of them was clearly better than the other 3, but we also knew she was attending other tryouts. I spoke to her dad to gauge their interest. I felt that the interest was limited, so I offered her a spot and asked for an answer in 24 hours. At that point I moved on to the next player, who accepted immediately. Since we only ever needed a few players, we never really worried much about other team's tryouts. We filled our spots and moved on. The last three years, we didn't conduct tryouts at all. All available spots were filled by players that had reached out to me. I knew each of them personally and had no need to conduct a tryout with any of them.

I know it holds up the works, and pitchers really do hold a lot of power. All I know is that we had one team completely implode because 2 of 3 pitchers quit and then another team that promised good pitching but did not live up to the promises. For DD's first year of 16U (an important year for recruiting purposes), we just don't want another scenario where the coach promises "high A level" play and then we wind up either in B tournaments most of the time or getting our butts kicked all the time in A level tournaments (like happened to us last year) because our pitchers are still developing and just not ready. We just aren't going to commit until we're sure. If the coach won't wait and wants to move on, I understand.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
42,860
Messages
680,237
Members
21,513
Latest member
cputman12
Top