The majority of college coaches are surprisingly really, really slow to change their recruiting habits or how they think or coach, so I wouldn't hold your breath.
A large number like to take athletes or specific profiles of athlete over softball players thinking they can 'fix it' or coach up the athlete and take on projects - ignoring that this 'project' has been playing softball since she was 8 and they will just be another in a long line of coaches who will not make any difference.
I have had multiple conversations over the year about 'potential' versus 'finished product' with college coaches when they were considering and comparing two of our players. I will tell you the coaches who took 'finished products' over potential generally got 3-4 year contributors (more often or not starters) while projects generally ended up providing nothing - in the best case they got 2 decent years.
There is a list of coaches I call when certain types of players enter our organization and start the recruiting process. You don't meet their profile of what makes a player in their program, it really doesn't matter how good you are, you aren't getting recruited there. The opposite as well - they can be a terrible player but they have the things they are looking for they have a real chance.
I have seen some changes though. A few years ago it seemed Bama would throw a big hitter into a corner OF spot to have their bat in the lineup even if it was a defensive liability. They are not doing this anymore and play with three true outfielders.