More bad news for Auburn

riseball said:

So were it not for weed they would not have been addicted to meth? Is that what you are going with?

Click to expand...

slugger3 said:

Of the 2, what is more likely to lead to addiction to "hard drugs".

An alcohol drinker, who does not smoke marijuana? Ever.
Or a recreational marijuana user, who if in a non legalized state, is obtaining their weed from a drug dealer, and is around other people who may already be using or have access to "hard drugs"?

Click to expand...

riseball said:

So again, in the abscence of weed they would never use meth? In the abscence of weed they would not use something else and then progress to meth? That premise makes zero sense.

Click to expand...

slugger3 said:

And once again you are avoiding my questions...

My answer to your questions are as follows:
It is my belief that a person is much more likely to experiment with and get addicted to "hard drugs" if they, they are already using weed.
They are exposed to the people, atmosphere and the dealers who have it.

Is it a 100% guarantee, that if you use weed, you are going to experiment with and get addicted to hard drugs? No

Is it more likely you will experiment with "hard drugs" if you are already if full aceeptance of weed. In my opinion, yes.

So can you please answer my questions? Who is more likely to get addicted to hard drugs?
The person who only drinks, and does not ever smoke weed?
Or the recreational/weed user?

Click to expand...