So who makes the field.. and who doesn't...

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

marriard

Not lost - just no idea where I am
Oct 2, 2011
4,316
113
Florida
OK, because I was bored I went through the conferences and looked to see who is likely in and out...

Note: First run through, first thoughts.... probably some outright mistakes below :)


-------------------------

There are 32 autobids - one from each D1 conference.

Power conferences:
SEC gets minimum 10 - Mississipi State and Ole Miss should be a little worried and a win in the SEC 1st round would help. Missouri to be talked about later.
PAC12 gets 5 with Cal probably 6 and Oregon State worried.
Big Ten 4 - Michigan & Minnesota... Then 2 of Ohio State, Northwestern & Illinois depending on BigTen tourney. Indiana is currently below .500 so unless they win, they wont make it.
ACC 2 FSU & Pitt in, North Carolina probably, BC/Notre Dame worried and probably need to make ACC final to be sure
Big 12 Gets 3 - OK, OK State and Baylor. Texas has to be concerned.

So that is 20 at large bids taken care of, another 3 probably and lots of worried teams that with a tournament win will more to probably. lets call it 25 total with a couple of wins for some teams in conference tournaments - leaving only 7 spots for real at large-teams.

For non-power conferences:

For 19 conferences the automatic bid will be their only bid no matter what happens.

That leaves 8 conferences where there are teams where there are teams that should get at-large bids even if they don't get an autobid and upsets will cause a real problem:

- American Athletic - should get two. USF, Houston, Witchita State & UCF all have similar very good records.
- A10 - strong chances of two - Umass should be in either way, Fordham is strong bubble, Daytona probably have to get the autobid
- Atlantic Sun - chance of 2 - USC Upstate IN, Kennesaw State bubble - but there is several teams in conference that could win the auto-bid
- Big Sky - chance of 2 - Montana & Weber State probably both deserve a spot (but will probably only get one)
- Big South - chance of 2 - Liberty and Longwood deserve to be in. Radford need the auto-bid
- Big West - should get 2 - Cal State Fullerton and Long Beach State IN
- Colonial - string chance of 2 - James Madison & Hofstra should be IN - Towson need an autobid
- Southern - UNCG IN , Mercer on the bubble

If teams like UNCG, USC Upstate, Umass lose or team like Towson, Raford or Daytona win there is going to be a squeeze.

Now Missouri... first the whole Wichita State thing was low enough, but lying and pretending they were worried about 'the weather' instead of just saying they were gaming the system has left a bad taste in some peoples mouth. Not making the SEC tournament is going to be highlighted by it being played at their fields without them. Just being in the SEC (which automatically gives you a high RPI) shouldn't be a guarantee of making the field. Sure they probably are better (especially on paper) than a lot of the teams who could get at-large bids and their non-conference schedule is a mix of some good and bad wins and losses and some cupcakes. A team like Hofstra or JMU shouldn't miss out because they lose their conference tournament over a team that won only 1 rain shortened SEC series this season.

Unless there are NO upsets of mid-conference 'IN' teams and the committee just rolls over for the SEC (again), I don't believe they should get in. You would assume teams like Miss State, Ole Miss, Notre Dame & Oregon State who are in their tournaments are in before Missouri is.
Oregon State have similar issues with their record but at least have a chance with 3 games at Utah coming up starting Thursday and a chancre to get to 10 conference wins.

In my mind, the discussion should be more on whether teams like Miss State and Ole Miss get in. I am big on getting more other conference teams into the tournament. I believe it is good for the game in general and while it is impossible to say how some of these teams would do in the SEC or PAC12, the reality is that they are not in these conferences and dominating their conference - tournament win or not - should be rewarded.

------------------------------------------

Lets go the other way and just go heavy Power Conference at large bids:
- All the SEC teams get in so 12 at large
- PAC 12 gets 6
- Big 10 gets 3
- Big 12 gets 3
- ACC gets 4

That likely leaves only 4 non-power At-Large bids. That is probably not enough and a strong team with 38-40 wins will likely miss out (I am guessing one of James Madison, Hofstra, Cal State Fullerton or Long Beach State).

I guess we will find out if this is the year the mid-conferences get a little more attention.
 
Last edited:
May 15, 2016
926
18
That likely leaves only 4 non-power At-Large bids. That is probably not enough and a strong team with 38-40 wins will likely miss out (I am guessing one of James Madison, Hofstra, Cal State Fullerton or Long Beach State).

Being a fan of one of these teams, now I am a little concerned.
 
May 3, 2018
75
18
I hope this dude is wrong: Bracketology | College Sports Madness He seems to have a bunch of small schools in which is fine, but am curious as to the rationale of the ACC getting 3 teams in but Pitt isn't one of those teams. Pitt had a better record, a substantially better conference record, and one the season series 2 games to none against Louisville, who he has in the tournament. I'm still kind of new to following softball, but this doesn't seem to make any sense to me. Anyway, I guess we find out Sunday night.
 

marriard

Not lost - just no idea where I am
Oct 2, 2011
4,316
113
Florida
I hope this dude is wrong: Bracketology | College Sports Madness He seems to have a bunch of small schools in which is fine, but am curious as to the rationale of the ACC getting 3 teams in but Pitt isn't one of those teams. Pitt had a better record, a substantially better conference record, and one the season series 2 games to none against Louisville, who he has in the tournament. I'm still kind of new to following softball, but this doesn't seem to make any sense to me. Anyway, I guess we find out Sunday night.

This is a straight 'no upsets/power conference' bracket - so this bracket predicts the conference champions being the regular season champion and getting the autobid. Any upset in those - and it is '1 game' upsets - and it can quickly become messy. Like if Mercer beats UNGC in the Southern. UNCG deserves an at-large either way.

The few things I see that I disagree with. I can't see Louisville making it over Pitt and Notre Dame isn't all that impressive this year. I can't see how Nebraska makes the field either with a losing conference record especially over Illinois. But otherwise this isn't a bad bracket. The loser here is whoever loses the America Athletic (He has USF in as an autobid - but that leaves one of Houtson, Witchita State or UCF out), Longwood, Mercer and a few others.
 
May 3, 2018
75
18
Not sure why they even need a selection committee if they're just going to go straight RPI. Pitt got jobbed. They had all the numbers over Notre Dame other than RPI, where I believe UND was 43 and Pitt was 48. Pitt did much better in conference, had a better record overall, and dominated when you compare common opponents.
 
Feb 15, 2017
920
63
The only SEC team I question is Misery. What's the stats on SEC teams vs the other conferences reaching the WCWS the last 4-5 years?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,877
Messages
680,274
Members
21,504
Latest member
winters3478
Top