I am shocked it took so long, and they did it right before collegiate play starts. They did a full investigation year before last (if I am remembering correctly) and decided to keep him at that point. If they didn't find reason to get rid of him then, I wonder what forced the change in thinking now. It looks like the AD statements of culture and environment were exactly what the investigation was about previously. Hmmm....
Anyone on here have a DD at Mizzou? Or have any idea of what changed?