My DD was born on New Year's Eve, which means every other year she is the absolute youngest player in her age bracket (no one plays up in our league during the summer). She also happens to be one of only two pitchers on her team. Over the years, we have become gradually 'wedded' to this team, both emotionally and by necessity (if she left, there would be only one team instead of two in her age bracket, and many of the girls would not be able to play).
In my honest opinion, our talent pool puts us somewhere between an excellent "C" team and an average "B" team. The girls certainly seem to enjoy playing together, but I think few if any of them will be staying with the sport beyond high school.
After a surprisingly successful 14 "C" season, we are now faced with a problem that many second year 14 U "B" and "C" teams have had to struggle with: What to do with the "5 high-school players" limit imposed by ASA? As all but three of our players entered high school this fall, we simply can't reconstitute the same team as a "B" team for the coming season. Meanwhile, nearly all of these girls continue to want to play together, and players from the younger team below us are not particularly keen to fill any vacant spots on our team should we decide to put together an ASA-legal 14 "B" team.
Our coaches are now playing with the idea of converting ours into a 14 "A" team, so that all of our high-school girls will have a chance to rejoin the team. However, others in the league are adamant that we'd be better off going the 16 "B" route, as this would allow us to both keep our high-schoolers and maintain the community nature of the team (which is after all one of the main purposes of the league), and, according to some at least, the competition at 16 "B" would be more at our level. The latter point is in direct contradiction with our coaches' prediction that our chances of doing well in 16 "B" will be vastly more remote compared to how we would fare against 14 "A" teams.
I had no prior exposure to fastpitch until my DD got involved in the sport, so I have absolutely no clue which of the above predictions is more realistic. Since my daughter plays an important role on the team, the coaches want me on board when the decision is made. I'd like to understand what really lies ahead before deciding one way or the other.
Any comment or suggestion from those who have gone through this before?
Thanks!
GT
P.S., Sorry if this topic had been covered before. I did a quick search here and didn't find what I was looking for.
In my honest opinion, our talent pool puts us somewhere between an excellent "C" team and an average "B" team. The girls certainly seem to enjoy playing together, but I think few if any of them will be staying with the sport beyond high school.
After a surprisingly successful 14 "C" season, we are now faced with a problem that many second year 14 U "B" and "C" teams have had to struggle with: What to do with the "5 high-school players" limit imposed by ASA? As all but three of our players entered high school this fall, we simply can't reconstitute the same team as a "B" team for the coming season. Meanwhile, nearly all of these girls continue to want to play together, and players from the younger team below us are not particularly keen to fill any vacant spots on our team should we decide to put together an ASA-legal 14 "B" team.
Our coaches are now playing with the idea of converting ours into a 14 "A" team, so that all of our high-school girls will have a chance to rejoin the team. However, others in the league are adamant that we'd be better off going the 16 "B" route, as this would allow us to both keep our high-schoolers and maintain the community nature of the team (which is after all one of the main purposes of the league), and, according to some at least, the competition at 16 "B" would be more at our level. The latter point is in direct contradiction with our coaches' prediction that our chances of doing well in 16 "B" will be vastly more remote compared to how we would fare against 14 "A" teams.
I had no prior exposure to fastpitch until my DD got involved in the sport, so I have absolutely no clue which of the above predictions is more realistic. Since my daughter plays an important role on the team, the coaches want me on board when the decision is made. I'd like to understand what really lies ahead before deciding one way or the other.
Any comment or suggestion from those who have gone through this before?
Thanks!
GT
P.S., Sorry if this topic had been covered before. I did a quick search here and didn't find what I was looking for.