Loading
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Interesting day with pocket radar at college tourney

  1. #1
    I'm a fan Pitching Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 46 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Interesting day with pocket radar at college tourney

    Yesterday I went to a college tournament and used my pocket radar to see what kind of speeds these ladies were actually throwing. Now this was an NAIA tourney but I was really surprised at the lack of speed and movement of pitches from numerous girls. Most all the ladies threw in the mid-high 50's with two actually attaining 62 mph and the slowest pitcher was consistently 49-51. I was very surprised, also I stood behind home plate and most of the girls only had one or two pitches and the movement was minimal at best. The pitchers who were effective also had very good change ups and used them on most every batter. I was shocked at the low speeds these girls pitching in college with. These are grown women who have been pitching for 10+ years. Maybe these schools need to start recruiting on this site since we seem to have a lot of 10yr old girls throwing 50+.... Lol

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Pitching Dad For This Useful Post:

    JAD (03-03-2013),nanotech14 (03-03-2013),Rocketech1 (03-03-2013),RubberBiscuit (03-03-2013)

  3. #2
    Softball Junkie smddad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Riding the pine
    Posts
    554
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 194 Times in 125 Posts

    Default

    The question that really matters is, how effective were they?

  4. #3
    13th Step Softball Addict coach james's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Mid West
    Posts
    1,793
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 566 Times in 407 Posts

    Default

    55mph with great movement is better than 65mph on a level plane

  5. #4
    Certified softball maniac CoogansBluff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,387
    Thanks
    572
    Thanked 817 Times in 527 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pitching Dad View Post
    Maybe these schools need to start recruiting on this site since we seem to have a lot of 10yr old girls throwing 50+.... Lol
    Excellent.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to CoogansBluff For This Useful Post:

    Coachmom (03-04-2013)

  7. #5
    Super Moderator sluggers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    3,992
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 1,363 Times in 648 Posts

    Default

    There is a huge difference between NAIA and D1 (except Oklahoma City, which is more like a pro-am team).
    \
    Ray

    Every softball parent keeps a hockey mask and a butcher knife in their car...

  8. #6
    Certified softball maniac Sparky Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,404
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 342 Times in 232 Posts

    Default

    Was talking to a guy who had two DD's who played in college. One of them played at Northwestern and the other at a small NAIA school. We were in Florida during March watching our daughters play. He told me the biggest difference he saw between the two divisions was the size and athleticism of the athletes. The D1 girls were just bigger, faster and stronger. The game was much faster at the top tier D1 level.

    There are the D1 capable players at the NAIA level who are there for their own reasons. Usually for the academics. But, they are the exception rather than the rule.

  9. #7
    Certified softball maniac RubberBiscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Behind the cheddar curtain
    Posts
    1,847
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 639 Times in 400 Posts

    Default

    More data points:

    We've been to a few mid-major exposures and multi-camps.

    Not even mentioning speeds right away there we loads of pitchers at these events. At the TN-tech event it appeared to be over 100 HS pitchers there. Seemed 75% of these girls threw at least upper 50's. it seemed like there were maybe ten that were noticeably faster with two that were noticeably faster within this top group. (But i would bet ya the top speed pitcher was still less than 65.)

    Point i am trying to make is that there are loads of 2014/2015 pitchers throwing upper 50's.

    It boils down to movement that is gonna seperate.

  10. #8
    Dummy Dad rdbass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks
    1,059
    Thanked 1,583 Times in 1,135 Posts

    Default

    The only true measure of how fast the pitchers throw is to ask there dads. ''We don't need no stinken radars''.
    Last edited by rdbass; 03-03-2013 at 07:20 PM.
    "Time the arm to stride, time the ball to swing".

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rdbass For This Useful Post:

    Jillsdad (03-06-2013),MandM (03-03-2013)

  12. #9
    Checking out the clubhouse sutherlandfinch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 35 Times in 14 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RubberBiscuit View Post
    More data points:

    We've been to a few mid-major exposures and multi-camps.

    Not even mentioning speeds right away there we loads of pitchers at these events. At the TN-tech event it appeared to be over 100 HS pitchers there. Seemed 75% of these girls threw at least upper 50's. it seemed like there were maybe ten that were noticeably faster with two that were noticeably faster within this top group. (But i would bet ya the top speed pitcher was still less than 65.)

    Point i am trying to make is that there are loads of 2014/2015 pitchers throwing upper 50's.

    It boils down to movement that is gonna seperate.

    We've been to a lot of similar camps. 61 is probably the high average from the top 10% of throwers. From that speed and up, Say to 64,there are always a group that achieve velocity w/o much movement. It is very hit and miss as to real movement on the ball but 16-ish throwing, in the 63 range with movement on her pitches does exist...... it's just not common and many are "off the market" by then.

  13. #10
    Softball Junkie slingnit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    520
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked 197 Times in 134 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coach james View Post
    55mph with great movement is better than 65mph on a level plane
    Not sure I totally agree with that. Speed with location would be more effective than movement w/o speed. But I get what you are saying.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to slingnit For This Useful Post:

    Jillsdad (03-06-2013)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Segment -- Burn -- Conversion --