- Jul 26, 2010
- 3,567
- 0
I'm kinda a statistical guy and process my information according.
What gets me when looking over the stats is the batting average of fastpitch. Let's look at D1, when I see 3/4 of the roster above .300 and some even above .400 it gets me to thinking that at some point the pitching approach will have to adjust to the clear advances in batting. Slide over to proffessional baseball and you're a god if you hit over .300.
Some will argue its the bats, a valid point to a degree. But what if we had a deeper bullpen in FP, if we had specialty pitchers? Let's take the fact that most say you need a good drop/rise/CU for D1. Well what do you think I'd work my batters on hitting ALL the time? I'd make them see the rise and drop until they puke.
So what if I'm up against a team who hammers the drop and rise? Wouldn't it be effective to bring in a east/west pitcher, or someone who can "run" the rise/drop, or even a different handed pitcher? Just something to shake things up a bit.
Don't get me wrong, I love to watch FP. But for me the pitching side has little fan appeal. There is no strategy about who to match up against opponents, no rotations, and very little options when that mule gets in a bind.
You're talking about college ball with female athletes. The money isn't there for a deep bullpen.
-W