FiveFrameSwing
Banned
Bouldersdad, I thought it through … as you suggested … and I'm still of the opinion that a no-stride approach allows one to capture the full sequence.
As one that strives to learn. May I ask why you are of this opinion? I understand that some books as you referenced will say it. But what I would like to know is your view. How and why you prefer it. Believing and rightly so in the Hanson Principle if the majority of the MLB,rs swing a certain way. Then why would it not be the correct way to teach our young ones as we all are trying to do.
Not trying to be difficult just trying to understand. I believe as you do that our hitters should strive to be as good as they can be. This as an instructor just gives me more knowledge to decide what is the best in the long run to teach my students.
Thanks.
Tim
Bouldersdad, Screwball ….. despite the description of a golf ball given here … e.g., 1.6-oz, latex center, wrapped by rubberbands, encased in a dimpled cover … and a belief that the balls are made to jump …… Despite that, many golfers place a sincere interest in club swing speed.
IMO, a no stride approach still allows one to capture the full sequence.
From that statement it gave the impression that you thought a no stride was what you thought was correct.
Secrets in the dirt was what I was referring to that you stated.
I am just wondering why your thought process would allow the swing to complete its self with forward momentum without the stride.
That was all I really wanted to know is how it can be accomplished in your words. nothing more. I like to listen to all sides. in my opinion if the mechanics of a swing are laid out true and pure to the best of our abilities as instructors we help those that come here for assistance.
Tim